Government Interference Does More Sustainability Damage than Good
Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 12:01AM
Governments around the world are constantly touting their sustainability initiatives and patting each other on the back for a job well done yet in reality many other initiatives, tax breaks and accepted practices negate those sustainability measures making any real growth in sustainability an exercise in futility. This topic is discussed in length in the article, “Perverse Government Subsidies Impede Sustainable Business”, on The Guardian.
At the heart of the issue the article describes the following as the issues at work:
“For many economists, subsidies and any other government interference in the market are undesirable purely because they distort competition and lead to inefficiencies. So far as sustainability is concerned, that generalised opposition is not the point. The point is that governments espouse a variety of ways to advance sustainability, but at the same time operate spending policies that make it more difficult.”
The article points out, repeatedly, the fact proven time and time again that the more governments insert themselves into the economy to ‘help’ one group or another the more damage is actually done. There is a natural order to supply and demand along with consequences that will dictate business decisions. When a governing body disrupts such systems with tax breaks and subsidies the results are far more damaging to sustainability than if left alone with no government driven sustainability campaigns.
Case in point: “This effect of using more because the price is lower applies in many ways, some less direct. For example, tax benefits led companies to provide company cars, encouraging excessive mileage.”
Companies seriously trying to make all their practices reflect sustainably-friendly ideals should not rely on any bureaucracy to help but rather turn to a trusted sustainability consultant with years of experience. Dr. Tyra Oldham has been consulting with companies for green change long before any administration jumped on the bandwagon and understands the steps necessary for real change to occur.
Catherine Lamsfuss, May 31, 2012

